|
Post by MartinT on Sept 10, 2014 6:58:35 GMT
Pardon?
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Sept 10, 2014 7:01:25 GMT
He said it's 8 o'clock!My ears.....
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Sept 10, 2014 7:04:11 GMT
LOL - you would have serious early warning capability with those!
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 10, 2014 7:20:35 GMT
The frequency response curve, or lack of curve, with my headphones confirms what I hear is beautifully free from peaky sound It is intereting those who dismiss measurements are usually those least able to understand them . Sorry but that is meaningless. What we seem to have at the moment is an uneasy consensus that measurements can't tell you everything but they v are useful. But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. Though I concede amplifier par and speakers sensitivity may suggest compatibility issues. And alan s I bet you 10 pound I can understand any explanation you care to post.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Sept 10, 2014 7:23:47 GMT
Indeed!
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Sept 10, 2014 7:36:04 GMT
If you're not getting any sort of a curve, then you need to plug your headphones in!
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Sept 10, 2014 7:45:14 GMT
But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. If you want practical experience as to how measurements can be useful, I have already posted frequency plots that I carried out with my system. It helped to identify bass room resonance modes and I took action to put resistive material into the speaker ports to reduce the bass resonance, with visible confirmation by measurement. See here for more details.
|
|
|
Post by dvh on Sept 10, 2014 7:58:58 GMT
The frequency response curve, or lack of curve, with my headphones confirms what I hear is beautifully free from peaky sound It is intereting those who dismiss measurements are usually those least able to understand them . I don't dismiss measurements (though as an aside I wonder how many measurements of, eg speaker sensitivity are accurate) but I'm certainly one of the least able to understand them. Same with circuit diagrams. I put this down to sheer stupidity on my part.
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 10, 2014 9:02:31 GMT
But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. If you want practical experience as to how measurements can be useful, I have already posted frequency plots that I carried out with my system. It helped to identify bass room resonance modes and I took action to put resistive material into the speaker ports to reduce the bass resonance, with visible confirmation by measurement. See here for more details. Firstly , You can stuff ports and listen without a frequency plot and by your own admission the change in plot is not commensurate with the change in sound . Secondly , that is an in room frequency measurement of your entire hifi . Whilst I am skeptical as to what they can tell you over and above listening , there is no harm in it . However , buying a speaker on its anechoic flat frequecny response would imo be disastrous .
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 10, 2014 9:04:42 GMT
Lost for words ?
|
|
|
Post by welder on Sept 10, 2014 9:19:24 GMT
I used to believe that threads like this were started with mischievous intent. I came to realise after reading a number of similar threads that the protagonists and many contributors really don’t understand the principles of measurement and their application. A few points worth noting. DQ writes that if he says he is six inches tall we will know that he’s lying. Is this true or even the most likely conclusion given the title of the thread? I would assume given DQ obviously has a few problems with this measurement business that he has got his units all muddles up and what he actually meant was he is in fact six feet tall. I wouldn’t automatically assume he’s a liar. I do realise however that some people do dismiss as lies what they don’t understand or are unable to adequately argue against. Of course, any measurement taken in isolation may not seem particularly informative; take for example DQ’s 50 Watt amplifier example. I shall keep it simple because I know I must. What the stated measurement of 50 Watts tells you is that it isn’t rated at 10 Watts, or 500 Watts. What should be becoming obvious one often needs more than one measurement, particularly when dealing with systems. In fact, the more measurements one makes the more likely the accurate prediction of a systems performance becomes. I have it on good authority that some designers of audio equipment don’t even listen to their products; they know how it will perform from the measurements; a bit of a shocker this for those who believe audio designers spend weeks listening to their creations. Ah, but they don’t know how it will sound though do they I hear some cry. Well actually they don’t need to for pretty much everything except loudspeakers because none of the other stuff makes a sound, (hopefully). I know this myself from extensive listening sessions of my amp/Dac/wires/etc, they’re all remarkably sound free until I plug them all together and listen through a speaker of some sort; weird that. Of course I could be deaf, or maybe my electronic equipment isn’t resolving enough......... Of course one needs to have some knowledge of what measurements mean and in what circumstances they are applicable. However levels of ignorance displayed in threads like this are frankly the delight of the audio trade. I loved this one “But all Watts are not equal?” Perhaps some Watts are more equal than others? ....Hang on, I’m getting my pigs and Watts confused. Measurements can tell you everything you might wish to know about a system or component if you can make enough of them EXCEPT how an individual will perceive that system, or component. Knowing what to measure and what those measurements tell you is all part of that wonderful journey of discovery which alas some have yet to make the first step on.
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 10, 2014 9:29:11 GMT
Wenger , you have stated your opposition not proven your point . I am happy to accept I dont understand and the reason for that is cause I can find nothing that can make me understand .
your semantic pedantry over me being mistaken or lying vis-a-vis six inches proves nothing . As for your designers point ,my comment was restricted to purchasers . I accept a designer would wish to take measurements. [ in this regard i would draw an analogy with an mri scan in the hands of doctor and a lay person ] Additionally , i would still question what they do in fact tell them . As for the designer who deosnt listen only measures if i am not mistaken i believe he makes god awful loudspeakers .
Your final paragraph is rehtoric .
Your argument appears to be measurements mean bugger all to dummies and everything to experts .
i am reminded of peter gabriel not one of us
A foreign body And a foreign mind Never welcome In the land of the blind You may look like we do Talk like we do But you know how it is
You're not one of us Not one of us No you're not one of us
PS - Speaking of Peter Gabriel on Friday it is 37 years ago since Steve Biko was murdered in a prison cell , a good enough reason to play Biko if ever one was needed .
|
|
|
Post by AlanS on Sept 10, 2014 9:40:40 GMT
The frequency response curve, or lack of curve, with my headphones confirms what I hear is beautifully free from peaky sound It is intereting those who dismiss measurements are usually those least able to understand them . Sorry but that is meaningless. What we seem to have at the moment is an uneasy consensus that measurements can't tell you everything but they v are useful. But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. Though I concede amplifier par and speakers sensitivity may suggest compatibility issues. And alan s I bet you 10 pound I can understand any explanation you care to post. Daniel Sorry to hear you are unable to find any meaning in my comment, thats subjectivism for you. I am not a bettng person or enjoy endless debates which achieve nothing. Enjoy your thread. I see meaning in the trace, thats all that matters to me.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Sept 10, 2014 9:43:54 GMT
If you want practical experience as to how measurements can be useful, I have already posted frequency plots that I carried out with my system. It helped to identify bass room resonance modes and I took action to put resistive material into the speaker ports to reduce the bass resonance, with visible confirmation by measurement. See here for more details. Firstly , You can stuff ports and listen without a frequency plot and by your own admission the change in plot is not commensurate with the change in sound . Secondly , that is an in room frequency measurement of your entire hifi . Whilst I am skeptical as to what they can tell you over and above listening , there is no harm in it . However , buying a speaker on its anechoic flat frequecny response would imo be disastrous . Hang on, the goalposts are creaking as they are being moved...
My plots were measurements (check the scale, they aren't just made up curves) taken with a view to helping me understand what was happening with my system in my room. They did help me to understand, and to see the corrections I made (I only published the final plots). My remark about them not having changed as much as I had expected after listening goes to the counter-argument that measurements don't tell the whole story. However, I believe I answered your requirement for the usefulness of a measurement.
Anyone who bought a speaker based on its frequency response curve would be a fool, but I don't think anyone is advocating that here?
I can't wait for Peter Gabriel on 3rd December at Wembley Arena. Are you going?
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 10, 2014 10:06:54 GMT
So taking in to account what as been said to date - I can accept that in room frequency response measurement made at the listening position can map the respective loudness of the frequencies you are hearing . This graph may help you tailor a sound to your preferences , but there is no absolute correlation between leveling the graph and preferred sound quality . Any adjustments may or may not be preferred . See we are making progress . i was due to see Gabriel at the O2 in a box last October , but my avatar was born i am trying to see him closer to home at the mo .
|
|
Marco
Rank: Trio
Banned
Posts: 242
|
Post by Marco on Sept 10, 2014 18:11:32 GMT
I think that if you’re into top-notch vinyl replay, optimising certain measurement parameters can be the difference between achieving merely an ok sound and a truly excellent one - and if you don’t recognise that fact, then there’s a good chance that your vinyl set-up isn’t quite what it could be...
However, I do agree with the fundamental premise of DQ’s introductory post. Quite frankly, unless you’re a manufacturer of audio equipment (or are connected with that process in some way), and thus have a genuine need to carry out measurements, it’s pretty pointless obsessing over them, as they will only ever tell PART of the story - and, in most cases, a rather small part at that.
In terms of what’s genuinely useful to the average audio and music enthusiast, your ears ultimately tell you much more.
Marco.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2014 19:05:58 GMT
The frequency response curve, or lack of curve, with my headphones confirms what I hear is beautifully free from peaky sound It is intereting those who dismiss measurements are usually those least able to understand them . Sorry but that is meaningless. What we seem to have at the moment is an uneasy consensus that measurements can't tell you everything but they v are useful. But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. Though I concede amplifier par and speakers sensitivity may suggest compatibility issues. And alan s I bet you 10 pound I can understand any explanation you care to post. Personally I don't give a damm about cable measurements (LCR) but it is apparently critical to know the measurements of cables when connecting to some amplifiers to avert possible oscillation into oblivion
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Sept 10, 2014 19:08:25 GMT
it is apparently critical to know the measurements of cables when connecting to some amplifiers to avert possible oscillation into oblivion Correct - watch out especially when contemplating highly capacitive/inductive speaker cables with amps that have no Zobel compensation network.
|
|
Marco
Rank: Trio
Banned
Posts: 242
|
Post by Marco on Sept 10, 2014 19:15:23 GMT
What we seem to have at the moment is an uneasy consensus that measurements can't tell you everything but they v are useful. But not one understandable exploration as to any they are useful. A 'measurements obsessive’ I am most certainly not, but even I recognise the fundamental importance of correctly adjusting, via accurately measuring, VTA, VTF and azimuth, in relation to replaying vinyl to the highest sonic standard, on a quality turntable. Surely you’d consider that as useful? And if so, you’ve just answered what you’ve written above! Marco.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Sept 11, 2014 7:55:01 GMT
I find a simple DB meter very useful
Still surprised when my ears say quiet and the meter says not - and vice versa
|
|