|
Post by MikeMusic on May 14, 2019 10:31:45 GMT
Top man Hamilton and Mercedes
|
|
|
Post by robbiegong on May 21, 2019 6:40:02 GMT
RIP NIKI LAUDA ! My hero from childhood - An F1 Legend in the true sense of the word. I cant believe he's actually gone .....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2019 6:45:16 GMT
Seriously gutted about the news of Niki Lauda this morning, a true great in the sport of F1, he will be missed. R.I.P. Niki.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on May 21, 2019 6:50:57 GMT
Yes, I was sad hearing this on my drive into work.
A true legend, as Jenson Button said.
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on May 21, 2019 13:57:20 GMT
I always liked Lauda's straight taking. Will miss him telling it how it is.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on May 25, 2019 14:30:51 GMT
Magnificent qualy from Hamilton, doing what he does best when under pressure and delivering.
Verstappen in P3 shows that the Red Bull and Honda package are delivering, too.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on May 26, 2019 15:49:51 GMT
That's possibly the best and most flawless defensive drive from Hamilton ever. How he made those medium tyres last the distance with Verstappen all over him is amazing. Even Toto admitted they made a mistake with the tyres.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2019 16:21:44 GMT
That was one impressive drive by Lewis. It showed why people consider him to be so good. Not bad by a Verstappen, even with the slightly silly attempt at an overtake.
Lewis is certainly bossing Bottas now.
|
|
|
Post by robbiegong on May 26, 2019 17:53:10 GMT
That was one impressive drive by Lewis. It showed why people consider him to be so good. Not bad by a Verstappen, even with the slightly silly attempt at an overtake. Lewis is certainly bossing Bottas now. Can only agree, no idea how he got them to last out, although you could tell he had to work, concentrate and focus like a fiend to keep it all together. Not to mention having to push and defend to keep Verstappen at bay - the last thing he wanted / needed with those tyres - Stellar job !
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on May 26, 2019 19:47:55 GMT
Not sure why Merc went soft for Lewis? Mistake? The other lead 3 went hard.. crystal ball never working when you need it Riciardo won it last year with -150HP. So managing the lead with a wounded car can always be done at Monaco. Lewis did just that. Mad Max shouldn't have squeezed Bottas into the wall and contact like that - no need for it. He ruined Bottas' race! He could easily have put Lewis out with his late I'll judged chicane passing attempt. Luck had it that he did not. For me Max is still a hothead and self crippling his potential results in that repeated red mist he suffers from - but he makes a spectacle for us in the F1 circus..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2019 23:02:41 GMT
There’s a video doing the rounds on Facebook where Lewis comes in and drowns James Vowells and Bono for leaving him out for 68 laps on the wrong tyres, which is very funny. If I get a link that works I’ll post it,
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on May 28, 2019 20:56:19 GMT
Here's an account of it from the Guardian
Mercedes team spirits
Mercedes came within a whisker of losing a win that was in their hands in Monaco. Having put Lewis Hamilton on the medium tyres, the team principal, Toto Wolff, admitted the British driver had saved their race in bringing his car home and preventing Max Verstappen having a chance to pass. It was welcome for giving the race a tense climax that would otherwise have been lacking. Hamilton was vocal about his concerns throughout, which have been criticised but are the understandable complaining of a driver in a pressure situation he could do nothing about. But perhaps what was most telling was just what type of team Mercedes are, as illustrated afterwards. The chief strategist, James Vowles, said with wry humour he hoped for a hug from Hamilton after the race. Hamilton duly burst into the engineers’ room and proceeded to spray Vowles with champagne. “That’s for fucking giving me medium fucking tyres for 68 laps,” he said, laughing, before they did indeed hug. Mercedes is an exceptionally efficient machine but one clearly functioning with very human relationships.
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on May 28, 2019 20:57:09 GMT
Not sure why Merc went medium for Lewis? Mistake? The other lead 3 went hard.. crystal ball never working when you need it Riciardo won it last year with -150HP. So managing the lead with a wounded car can always be done at Monaco. Lewis did just that. Mad Max shouldn't have squeezed Bottas into the wall and contact like that - no need for it. He ruined Bottas' race! He could easily have put Lewis out with his late I'll judged chicane passing attempt. Luck had it that he did not. For me Max is still a hothead and self crippling his potential results in that repeated red mist he suffers from - but he makes a spectacle for us in the F1 circus..
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jun 8, 2019 21:24:39 GMT
All credit to Vettel for getting pole today. The prospect of Vettel and Hamilton, with 9 world championships between them, starting from the front row tomorrow is juicy.
How about Ricciardo 4th? Fantastic!
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on Jun 9, 2019 10:35:04 GMT
Coulthard asked Ricciardo how 4th place grid start, compared with winning a GP.. he made a comment how putting any car on the limit has a certain feeling in your tummy, even a rental. You could see Coulthard giving a double take. I'm fine with it if that rental is on track .. if it is on the road, mucking about and taking every corner as an ultimate challenge, you risk ending up like F. W. Williams or worse injuring / killing others. Too many variables on the road. Should not be encouraged. Nice to see Ferrari getting some performance together.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jun 9, 2019 10:55:21 GMT
I doubt Ricciardo was talking about doing that on public roads. Even if he did, he'd be safer than the average sales rep in his Audi.
Ferrari have got the performance for Montreal, but I'm not sure they've solved the fundamental issues with their car.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jun 9, 2019 20:21:07 GMT
Gosh, that's a Steward's Enquiry that will cause lots more argument. All credit to Vettel and Hamilton for a fantastic race at the front. My take on the incident was that Vettel was out of control when he re-entered the track. Whether that was deserving of the penalty, only the stewards could answer. Vettel was understandably upset and I sympathise with him. The two came across the line with around a second between them.
One thing that is known: Montreal (and Monza) favour the Ferrari over the Mercedes. It's close, but overall the Mercedes is the better car to date. This result pushes Hamilton more than a race win ahead.
|
|
|
Post by robbiegong on Jun 9, 2019 21:44:31 GMT
My view and thoughts - It was an error of Vettel's own doing that caused him to be in this situation and again the error came from having Hamilton pressurising him hard, it's what makes Hamilton what he is and what he's achieved - unrelenting and therefore I take nothing from him.
He's tough / intensely competitive, persistent, hence why these things happen, hence why he's always there or there about's.
I like Vettel a lot but if the truth be known and he's absolutely honest with himself, it's yet another error from himself that has been the root from whence everything else that has followed / happened to him today has been born from.
|
|
|
Post by Clive on Jun 10, 2019 9:30:41 GMT
I see the issue was that once Vettel had the car back under control he then squeezed Ham. A racer's instinct but certainly not within the rules. From motorsport.com, autosport carry the story too:
The stewards examined slow motion footage of Vettel's actions from the moment that he had regained control and started steering his car – and it was felt that it showed that the German could have chosen a different path than the one he took.
The footage clearly captures Vettel correcting an oversteer moment as he rejoins the track – which is shown by a sharp steering wheel movement to the right by the German.
Shortly after that, however, Vettel has dispatched the oversteer and begins steering to the left to follow the direction of the circuit - suggesting he is now under control.
But a split moment later, rather than keeping to the left, Vettel is shown to release the steering wheel which allows his car to drift to the right – cutting off the route that Hamilton would have taken had he had clear space.
The movement to straighten the wheel, which put Vettel into the path of Hamilton, is believed to be key to the unanimous decision by the stewards to punish Vettel.
A further reason the stewards established was through the use of an extra CCTV camera view of the incident, which was not broadcast on the international feed, showing Vettel's head looking in the mirrors at where Hamilton was during these moments when he was releasing the wheel to the right.
Onboard footage of the Vettel incident also shows his head looking towards the mirrors in the moment when he is drifting out, suggesting he knew where Hamilton was.
Had Vettel kept his car tight to the left once he had regained control, then there was likely enough room to have allowed Hamilton through on the right, in which case the matter would almost certainly not have been investigated.
The fact that telemetry data showed Hamilton had to brake to avoid the collision with Vettel showed how the Mercedes driver was caught out by his rival's actions.
Precedent for the Vettel decision to punish him for both rejoining the track in an unsafe manner and forcing a rival off the track was made last year in Japan when Max Verstappen was punished with a five-second penalty for a collision with Kimi Raikkonen at the chicane.
Verstappen had run wide at the chicane on the first lap of the race and rejoined in an aggressive manner, pushing Raikkonen wide on the exit.
At the time, the late F1 race director Charlie Whiting said: "You are required to rejoin safely and Kimi was there and pushing him off the track. So I think that was a fairly straightforward one for the stewards."
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jun 10, 2019 11:36:50 GMT
All seems fair enough.
|
|