|
Post by MikeMusic on Mar 25, 2023 16:44:12 GMT
New Scientist have excellent health articles. Often years before mainstream has it Delighted to see one can subscribe to a free weekly newsletter Health Check Hundreds of new studies about our physical and mental wellbeing are published every month, but the results can be conflicting and confusing. Our health newsletter will give you the health and fitness news you can really trust, every Saturday. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers. Health Check sign upYes, they would like you to subscribe to New Scientist but you can see free, good info Got my first one today and impressed. Closes in 24 hours so move fast
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Mar 25, 2023 16:51:10 GMT
Examples in my first one
Botox injections in forehead change brain activity linked to emotions
The key to better sleep might be a high-protein diet
This week, New Scientist has temporarily made seven previously paywalled articles about physical fitness free to read for registered users, to celebrate the launch of our latest New Scientist Essential Guide – Exercise: The real science of physical fitness.
I was struck by how many of the articles overturned widely believed myths. It seems physical fitness is fertile ground for encouraging the spread of false beliefs. Our promotion lasts until the end of Sunday 26 March, so if you get cracking, you may be able to read them all over the weekend. Here is what’s available:
Why doing more exercise won’t help you burn more calories
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on Mar 25, 2023 17:51:48 GMT
Sounds good.
You'll burn more calories, but if you don't use up what's in your blood stream, exercising, or just maintaining your operating system, it goes to fat.
Stuff enough food and of good nutritional quality in your mouth to run your system. Regulate as necessary, activity dependent.
Exercise is vital though for muscle retention, balance, circulation, brain activity, stress relief etc etc
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 15, 2023 10:15:58 GMT
Sea salt better than 'normal' salt Swapping table salt for potassium alternative cuts blood pressure and risk of heart problems"A study in care homes found that preparing meals with potassium-enriched salt, instead of regular salt, lowered the blood pressure of people aged over 55 and reduced their risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes By Alice Klein 13 April 2023 People aged over 55 may be among the most at risk of the effects of high blood pressure – and could have the most to gain from switching to low-sodium alternatives Replacing regular table salt with a potassium-enriched substitute reduces blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes, among people who are over 55 and living in care homes. Salt contains sodium, which can increase blood pressure. Salt substitutes that replace some of this sodium with potassium may lower blood pressure, however, few studies have shown their effectiveness among people over 55. Our blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular events increases with age, so these people may have the most to gain by making the swap. There are also concerns that these substitutes may cause high levels of potassium in the blood, called hyperkalemia, which can lead to serious heart problems in some cases. In a clinical trial made up of 1612 people who were living in 48 care facilities in China, meals were prepared with either regular salt containing 100 per cent sodium chloride or with a potassium-enriched salt substitute containing 62.5 per cent sodium chloride and 25 per cent potassium chloride, alongside other flavourings. Some of the participants also ate meals with just less salt in general. The participants were all over 55 years old, with an average age of 71. At the start of the study, the average blood pressure of the participants was 137.5/80.5 millimetres of mercury (mmHg), with the higher number representing systolic blood pressure – the force at which your heart pumps blood around your body – and the lower number showing diastolic blood pressure – the resistance to the blood flow in the blood vessels. An ideal reading is usually considered to be between 90/60mmHg and 120/80mmHg. Almost two-thirds of the participants had high blood pressure at the beginning of the trial. Over two years, those living in facilities where the potassium-enriched salt substitute was introduced had an average reduction in systolic blood pressure of 7.1mmHg and in diastolic pressure of 1.9mmHg, compared with those in the regular salt group. “This is an impressive fall in blood pressure – it’s at least what you’d expect to get if you gave everyone a [blood pressure-lowering] drug,” says Bruce Neal at the George Institute for Global Health in Sydney, Australia, who was part of the research team. The reduction in blood pressure was associated with 1.5 fewer heart attacks, strokes and other cardiovascular events per 100 people in the salt substitute group, compared with the regular salt group. In contrast, no reduction in the average blood pressure or number of cardiovascular events was seen in the group living in facilities that simply reduced the salt content of meals. This may be because these participants didn’t like the taste of the reduced-salt meals and therefore added salt themselves, says Neal. The researchers also found that while those in the salt substitute group had increased blood potassium levels, this wasn’t associated with any safety concerns. Salt substitutes are only marginally more expensive than regular salt and most people can’t taste the difference, says Neal. “If you look at the totality of the evidence, if everyone switched from regular salt to potassium-enriched salt, we could prevent millions of premature strokes and heart attacks around the world each year,” he says. Journal reference: Nature Medicine DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02286-8"
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Apr 15, 2023 10:19:45 GMT
I've been using Lo-Salt for years.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 15, 2023 10:27:01 GMT
Me too Nice to have it confirmed as a good thing The only salt I add to food is in the home made bread.
|
|
|
Post by petea on Apr 15, 2023 10:56:32 GMT
Don't confuse sea salt with potassium enriched salt. Sea salt is still mostly sodium chloride, but derived by evaporating sea water and so it contains various impurities, but very little potassium salts.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 15, 2023 12:27:44 GMT
Thanks Pete I'll check mine
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Apr 15, 2023 13:32:52 GMT
We don't have ordinary salt in the house.
|
|
|
Post by rfan8312 on Apr 15, 2023 18:49:28 GMT
Ex gf always used Himalayan pink salt. Had me thinking it was healthier option. But wow she used a lot of salt.
This sea salt looks better option.
|
|
|
Post by petea on Apr 15, 2023 20:28:03 GMT
Well, it is certainly more plentiful - no healthier though! Just use normal salt, but 66% less! Or better still, none.
|
|
|
Post by rfan8312 on Apr 16, 2023 21:04:29 GMT
Fair enough. Tbh I never got so much into salt. It was sugar that was a drug to me.
I'm trying to quit again and one lucky break I caught recently is that I was gifted a jar of Beetroot salad with peppers and it seems to take the edge off. Every few hours I have two scoops of it and have managed to not buy a sugary product since then.
Tbh sliced beets in a jar and this beetroot salad are actually quite tasty even. I was also given a jar of sauerkraut. It's not tastey but I eat a few scoops then chase it with the beets.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Apr 20, 2023 19:36:57 GMT
Reversing Alzheimer's with Coconut Oil:
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 22, 2023 14:42:58 GMT
Reverse type 2 Diabetes
Low-calorie diets
Time-restricted eating
Weight loss drugs
"The health news that caught my eye this week was a study showing that people with type 2 diabetes can go into long-lasting remission, just by losing weight.
While the link between obesity and type 2 diabetes is well-established, until recently, it was usually seen as a permanent condition, caused by the body’s cells becoming resistant to the blood sugar-regulating hormone insulin.
The latest finding comes from a five-year follow-up of a trial that aimed to test the effects of people with type 2 diabetes losing a significant amount of weight. They were supported to go on a very low-calorie diet – 800 calories a day for three months – and were then given weight maintenance advice and coaching.
Those who managed to keep the weight off certainly achieved an impressive result: staying in remission from type 2 diabetes for the full five years, as defined by not having high blood sugar and not needing to take diabetes medication. The results, not yet published in detail but summarised here, have led to enthusiastic news coverage of how health services should encourage more people to follow this method.
Reality bites Unfortunately, what got less attention was how small a proportion of the people who started the trial managed to keep the weight off. After five years, only 1 in 10 were still in diabetes remission. The results illustrate just how hard it is to lose weight and keep it off.
Low-calorie diets have long been seen as the only medically sanctioned route to weight loss, but there has been growing awareness recently that other approaches can work too. One alternative is a low-carbohydrate diet, in which people avoid sugary and starchy foods and fill up on high-protein and high-fat foods, such as meat and dairy, without counting calories.
Randomised trials have shown that this “low-carbing” is at least as effective as low-calorie diets for weight loss, possibly more, without raising the risk of heart attack. Such diets are now backed by several professional bodies for obesity or diabetes specialists.
Another kind of diet growing in popularity is time-restricted eating, also known as intermittent fasting, when people try to keep all their food intake within, say, an 8-hour window. Even though this can go against mainstream advice to never skip breakfast when trying to lose weight, some people find this an effective weight loss strategy.
Weight loss drugs More recently, there has been an explosion of interest in a new breed of weight loss drugs that mimic the actions of a hormone called glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Normally released when we eat, GLP-1 slows food digestion and so these medicines, such as one with the brand name Wegovy, help to reduce our appetite.
Most countries have authorised medicines such as Wegovy, given by a self-administered injection once a week, only for people above a certain weight. In most of the UK, it is approved for people with a body mass index (a measure of weight in relation to height) of 35 or over, or of 30 or more if someone also has a weight-related health condition.
These medicines aren’t a magic wand, as people are still supposed to combine their use with eating healthily and taking regular exercise. In some, they cause side effects such as nausea, which is unsurprising seeing as the drug slows stomach emptying. And when the medicine is stopped, the weight usually returns, which could leave people feeling like they are stuck needing these jabs forever.
But the arrival of any new kind of weight loss drug that is safe and effective heralds a genuine paradigm shift in the obesity field. The old idea that low-calorie diets are the only way to lose weight is going to have to be jettisoned. It’s hard to know exactly what the future of weight loss management will look like, but we could be in for a real upheaval.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Apr 22, 2023 17:06:58 GMT
The problem is that non-diabetics don't understand what a vicious circle we have to deal with. In order to retain control, we take as much insulin as we need to keep the sugar readings down to about the 6.0 level (anyone who tells me I should keep it at 5.0 should try driving and working for a living). The more insulin we take, the more weight we put on, or the harder it is to take off. If we eat less, it's tricky to know what dose to take. It's called balance for a reason and it's bloody hard to maintain. Furthermore, we take drugs like Metformin to increase our absorption of insulin, and that has its own side-effects like digestion troubles, which counters the accurate dosing we're trying to maintain.
I consider it a win if I can maintain my weight and my stamina to get through the day, day after day, without getting a hypo, suffering from buzzing feet or finding my eyesight blurring or many other unpleasant side-effects.
Reversing type 2 diabetes? We're just not there yet.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 22, 2023 17:26:23 GMT
My take is they had success with just obese people Easy wins with low hanging fruit maybe
|
|
|
Post by rfan8312 on Apr 23, 2023 4:57:12 GMT
Wow 800 calories! That's very very difficult I think. I've heard that nobody should go below 1200 calories.
Somehow I went from 200 pounds to 180 in guess 6 months (eating wheat bread mind you) with mackerel sandwiches, potatoes and fish or chicken everyday, and celery everyday and running a lot.
The doctor actually said to me that he didnt care what I ate, as a diabetic, as long as I kept my weight down.
Regarding carbohydrates I was instructed by a nutritionist for diabetics to only ingest 45 - 60grams of carbs per meal in 3 meals per day.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on May 7, 2023 9:37:02 GMT
Report of the particles put out by gas cookers paints a bad picture. "Worse than city streets" January 2023
Research ongoing but look to see all gas appliances banned in the not too distant future
Pain for me with a gas hob and gas boiler
In the meantime vent, extract or open a window when cooking a good idea Easy in the warm weather not so good in the cold
If you needed a nudge towards an electric hob here it is
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on May 7, 2023 11:11:58 GMT
We don't have gas so that's one good thing. Not that burning oil for heating is all that good.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on May 7, 2023 12:26:23 GMT
Oil next I guess. Ventilation the way to minimise any ill effects has to be the way
|
|