|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 21, 2014 12:08:42 GMT
Listening to Youtube I was reminded I was using our *capped* bandwith
Even more to the point we often downloadi large amounts of files to burn CDs and DVDs
I usually listen only so no point in the overhead of the pics
Does Spotty take a lot less then YT ?
What about others like Grooveshark - which has moving pics on the screen and Allmusic with moving picture adverts ?
|
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Oct 22, 2014 15:10:26 GMT
Spotify takes less bandwidth than YouTube as it's an audio-only stream. Probably the lowest bandwidth are the internet radio stations, like the wonderful Radio Paradise (you can select the bandwidth to use). |
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 22, 2014 20:31:04 GMT
Thanks. Good news
What about Grooveshark ?
It has a better hit rate for my obscure stuff than Spotty
|
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Oct 22, 2014 20:32:49 GMT
No idea. It should give its bandwidth somewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Oct 22, 2014 20:55:19 GMT
It varies with the particular file you're listening to I think. There is an option to go low bandwidth especially for folks with flaky connections.
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 23, 2014 7:28:21 GMT
I'll go looking.
Grooveshark wouldn't play just now, Youtube ok with video ...
|
|
|
|
Post by lurcher on Oct 23, 2014 20:23:29 GMT
ASCII Tab?
|-5--------------------------|---------------------------------|
|-5----x---------0-----------|------2--------------------------|
|-6----x--x\-----1h2p1-------|------2h4p2----------------------|
|-7----x--x\-----------2---2-|------------4-----7-7-7h9-9-7----|
|-x---12--x\---2---------4---|--------------0-5-----------7h9--|
|-5------14\-0---------------|-1s2-----------------------------|
|----5----------------------------|------------------------|
|----5h7-5-(5)\---------0---------|----2-----------------6-|
|--------4h=6\----(1)-1-1h2-------|----2h4-2-------------6-|
|-----------------------------2-2-|----------4-----7---6---|
|---------------------------------|------------0-5---4-----|
|-5-------------0-----------4-----|-2----------------------|
|
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Oct 23, 2014 21:12:18 GMT
I'll stick to circuit diagrams, thanks Nick  |
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 24, 2014 9:16:48 GMT
Right over my head
|
|
|
|
Post by Stratmangler on Oct 24, 2014 9:25:20 GMT
ASCII Tab?
|-5--------------------------|---------------------------------|
|-5----x---------0-----------|------2--------------------------|
|-6----x--x\-----1h2p1-------|------2h4p2----------------------|
|-7----x--x\-----------2---2-|------------4-----7-7-7h9-9-7----|
|-x---12--x\---2---------4---|--------------0-5-----------7h9--|
|-5------14\-0---------------|-1s2-----------------------------|
|----5----------------------------|------------------------|
|----5h7-5-(5)\---------0---------|----2-----------------6-|
|--------4h=6\----(1)-1-1h2-------|----2h4-2-------------6-|
|-----------------------------2-2-|----------4-----7---6---|
|---------------------------------|------------0-5---4-----||-5-------------0-----------4-----|-2----------------------|Nice one Nick - that's a bugger to play!  |
|
