|
Post by id4578 on Sept 8, 2014 20:50:03 GMT
Thanks for that. A good discussion between the two - good to hear a meat eater (Dawkins) talking rationally about what he perceives to be his own moral failings (rather than get either defensive or superior about it, or just plain silly).
|
|
|
Post by id4578 on Sept 8, 2014 21:47:11 GMT
Let me get one thing straight right here and now, I do not feel morally bereft in the slightest when I eat meat. I choose to eat meat as you yourself choose to eat vegetables. In the end, whether eating flora or fauna, it all has to die either before or during the act of consumption. This rule applies to every living thing on the planet so if you have a problem with it, take it up with your preferred deity or biosphere design committee if you are an atheist. That's a complete denial of the reality - it's an image of cloud cuckoo land where animals are just happily leaping about and suddenly die, say with a bullet to the back of their head (using the example from the video) and had lived a long and happy life. The reality is that most animals suffer before becoming meat on your plate, many terribly. So either you are denying yourself the realisation that you're causing suffering for your own pleasure (not survival - neither you nor your family need meat to live healthily) or do realise but you just don't give a shit.. I don't have a problem with people eating meat per se, just with the reality of how they are treated and how and when that death comes about when completely unnecessary. I wouldn't have a problem eating say road kill but I'd probably choose not to as I still would have no reason other than trivial pleasure (if in fact tasty) - I'd rather leave it for other animals to genuinely survive on. Neither would I hunt or kill unless for my own genuine survival. Yes, I do choose to eat because I wish to survive and that includes vegetables. I choose NOT to eat meat because I don't wish to cause suffering of animals. You do NOT eat meat to survive (because we can all survive perfectly well without meat). You choose to eat meat DESPITE the suffering it will cause. There IS a moral component to the different choices you and I make, they are not simple equivalents. Better to just blame societal norms and not having thought about it much rather than make justifications, I think anyway, else you start to dig yourself a moral hole, start to sound like you don't give a shit about anything. Of course there is a self-centred component to my choice too; I gain more enjoyment from living animals than I ever do from dead animals. That is increased by knowing truthfully that I mean them absolutely no harm when I interact with them.
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 9, 2014 7:23:14 GMT
Your arguement distilled is actually against capitalism not meat eating .
You are actually an American commie not a vegetarian. And if its a good enough sobriquet for Obama its good enough for you .
|
|
|
Post by dvh on Sept 9, 2014 7:52:06 GMT
Better to just blame societal norms and not having thought about it much rather than make justifications, I think anyway, else you start to dig yourself a moral hole, start to sound like you don't give a shit about anything. Whereas you start to sound a bit holier-than-thou. There is, of course, the point that the vast majority of farm animals simply wouldn't exist at all if we stopped eating meat, which gives rise to all sorts of moral conundrums
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Sept 9, 2014 8:42:42 GMT
Thanks Like what Peter Singer says and the way he says it - even with an Aussie accent
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 9, 2014 13:51:57 GMT
Better to just blame societal norms and not having thought about it much rather than make justifications, I think anyway, else you start to dig yourself a moral hole, start to sound like you don't give a shit about anything. Whereas you start to sound a bit holier-than-thou. There is, of course, the point that the vast majority of farm animals simply wouldn't exist at all if we stopped eating meat, which gives rise to all sorts of moral conundrums Indeed, which is what I am railing against. Please note ID that not once have I suggested that you should eat meat, neither have I cast aspersions on your character due to your lifestyle and that is because I respect freedom of choice, therefore kindly return the favour.
|
|
|
Post by danielquinn on Sept 9, 2014 14:19:15 GMT
Freedom of choice , is the freedom to do as you choose within the law . It is not a freedom which exonerates your choices for criticism ridicule or challenge .
Your a free to do as you choose ,I am free to call what you do stupid .
And to be pompous , it is fundamental to human development . sexism , rascism and homophobia are on the decline because people have stood up and said what you are doing and saying is stupid .
Of course , sexism , racism and homophobia are also now against the law .
|
|
|
Post by id4578 on Oct 14, 2014 19:57:25 GMT
Whereas you start to sound a bit holier-than-thou. There is, of course, the point that the vast majority of farm animals simply wouldn't exist at all if we stopped eating meat, which gives rise to all sorts of moral conundrums Indeed, which is what I am railing against. Please note ID that not once have I suggested that you should eat meat, neither have I cast aspersions on your character due to your lifestyle and that is because I respect freedom of choice, therefore kindly return the favour. (this to both dvh and Dave) As a thought experiment, imagine you were back in the days of the slave trade and you were arguing against slavery whilst everyone around you was either actively for it or not bothered and happy with the results of cheap labour. Imagine you know that a local slave has been beaten to within an inch of their lives for breaking a glass and no-one is speaking out about that cruelty, no-one appears to care and many even congratulate the perpetrator for keeping the slaves in their place, maintain the situation. In that environment, if you speak out about the beating and slavery as a whole aren't you naturally going to be called "holier-than-thou" ? Aren't you going to face accusations of thinking you are morally superior? What's the alternative? The alternative is to capitulate and stay silent, let the slave trade continue out of fear of personal criticism. Wouldn't that be the worst kind of cowardice, against everything we celebrate in heros of the past and of our time? (People did speak out, slavery was abolished and we've moved on morally as a society. ) So please think before you liberally accuse someone else of being "holier-than-thou" - that feeling is YOUR feeling when confronted by an alternative moral position. If your own moral position is strong and confident then why should there even be a hint of moral superiority being imposed? If you have your own doubts about the status quo deep down then at least examine those doubts ... life's too short for pride and an "I'm not going to be told what to do!" attitude IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by Greg on Oct 14, 2014 21:38:04 GMT
And God saith, 'Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness, and let them rule over fish of the sea, and over fowl of the heavens, and over cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that is creeping on the earth.'
'Good enough for me.'
|
|
|
Post by id4578 on Oct 14, 2014 22:55:04 GMT
haha, sponsored by McDonalds.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 15, 2014 7:58:44 GMT
And we're doing such a good job too
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on Oct 15, 2014 16:55:59 GMT
I'd come at it from the health angle - Red meat yes, couple of times a week. Anything with Sodium Nitrate / Nitrite added to it - No. Smoked stuff - No, not regularly.
|
|
|
Post by John on Oct 15, 2014 18:17:07 GMT
With me I not eaten red meat in 20 years but will eat fish and poultry
|
|
|
Post by yomanze on Oct 15, 2014 18:30:00 GMT
Let's think, millions of years of evolution culminating in us being hunter gatherers vs. settling, eating refined grains, carbs and sugars that we are utterly not designed for. Still love a pie, roasties and occasional chocolate though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2014 18:38:13 GMT
Let's think, millions of years of evolution culminating in us being hunter gatherers vs. settling, eating refined grains, carbs and sugars that we are utterly not designed for. Still love a pie, roasties and occasional chocolate though. What's this 'occasional' bit? A piece of dark stuff every day. Plus a high protein, high fat, low carb (ie sugar), lots of fruit and veg diet. Thus we developed, thus we in this household continue. We are now gluten free and feel 100% better for it. Our own animals are treated well and dispatched cleanly and quickly.
|
|
|
Post by John on Oct 15, 2014 19:02:01 GMT
If want to talk about toxic food wheat is pretty bad
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on Oct 15, 2014 19:59:15 GMT
Yes modern wheat should be avoided - spelt is much better. The times are a changing - the fat / cholesterol fear seems to be somewhat misplaced - ok lots and an unhealthy life style may have consequences but they just could not explain the increasing bowel cancer issues - until it seems the penny is beginning to drop... Still a way to go to nail it though and then even longer to change the foods we eat... I'm low wheat, 0 processed sugar, red meat couple of times a week and bit of fish / chicken maybe couple of times a week but the rest is veggie - never felt better... (famous last words eh?! - in Monty Python voice - "and then he was cut down in his prime" )
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Oct 16, 2014 8:01:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by id4578 on Oct 17, 2014 6:52:06 GMT
Let's think, millions of years of evolution culminating in us being hunter gatherers vs. settling, eating refined grains, carbs and sugars that we are utterly not designed for. Still love a pie, roasties and occasional chocolate though. What's this 'occasional' bit? A piece of dark stuff every day. Plus a high protein, high fat, low carb (ie sugar), lots of fruit and veg diet. Thus we developed, thus we in this household continue. We are now gluten free and feel 100% better for it. Our own animals are treated well and dispatched cleanly and quickly. Our evolution, physical development stopped a LONG time ago.. This long before animal husbandry, long before means to bring back large kills to the tribe etc... Small catches of fish, small animals maybe but not a lot of meat to feed the tribe daily. The mainstay of an ancient diet is plants readily available without too much effort. I remember watching a tv documentary about one of the few tribes still living as hunter-gatherers and the hunting party would go off into the jungle/forest on a multi-day trip, killed a little to feed themselves but often came back with nothing for everyone else - the rest of the tribe survived on things gathered and havested by the women. So high protein is not part of that evolution. More about plants plants plants and a little bit of meat. I guess those few by rivers would eat fish more often, depends where you happened to live I guess. If that's what you mean by "thus we developed"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2014 7:10:17 GMT
What's this 'occasional' bit? A piece of dark stuff every day. Plus a high protein, high fat, low carb (ie sugar), lots of fruit and veg diet. Thus we developed, thus we in this household continue. We are now gluten free and feel 100% better for it. Our own animals are treated well and dispatched cleanly and quickly. Our evolution, physical development stopped a LONG time ago.. This long before animal husbandry, long before means to bring back large kills to the tribe etc... Small catches of fish, small animals maybe but not a lot of meat to feed the tribe daily. The mainstay of an ancient diet is plants readily available without too much effort. I remember watching a tv documentary about one of the few tribes still living as hunter-gatherers and the hunting party would go off into the jungle/forest on a multi-day trip, killed a little to feed themselves but often came back with nothing for everyone else - the rest of the tribe survived on things gathered and havested by the women. So high protein is not part of that evolution. More about plants plants plants and a little bit of meat. I guess those few by rivers would eat fish more often, depends where you happened to live I guess. If that's what you mean by "thus we developed"? I can't see how the fact that we stopped changing some time ago affects the fact that our metabolism works the way it does. If the body is 'designed' one way, it seems a bit daft to feed it something else. Rather like putting petrol into a diesel engine?
|
|