|
Post by julesd68 on Feb 7, 2019 16:57:51 GMT
Who is familiar with Daniil Trifonov? "Without question the most astounding pianist of our age" The Times
He's Russian, only 27 years old, but already has quite a back catalogue of highly praised work and a number of prizes at international competitions. Anyone who gets this kind of praise from Martha Argerich needs to be listened to - Martha Argerich told the Financial Times in 2011 that Trifonov had "everything and more", adding that "What he does with his hands is technically incredible. It’s also his touch – he has tenderness and also the demonic element. I never heard anything like that"Here is an example of his work that has been getting the critics in a spin ... www.theguardian.com/music/2016/sep/21/liszt-transcendental-studies-paganini-review-daniil-trifonov-deutsche-grammophon-cd-classical
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Feb 8, 2019 9:54:35 GMT
No, not familiar at all. I have seen his recordings on Spotify etc, but he is of the Chopin, Rachmaninov, Liszt solo piano axis while I am of the Beethoven, Schubert, Mozart persuasion. As such all I can really say is 'Golly, he can play fast'. Listening at the moment to the Transcendental Liszt studies. Golly, he really can play fast. If he recorded the Liszt piano sonata, or Rach PC3, both among the rare exceptions where I am really into the CRL axis, then I would find more of interest to me.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Feb 8, 2019 10:21:50 GMT
... well, maybe Rach PC2 is worth a listen, old war horse that it is ... There are also some Bach transcription movements on this album that may be worthy of my attention.
|
|
|
Post by julesd68 on Feb 8, 2019 15:21:17 GMT
I completely agree with your comments on the Liszt - it's all very technical but rather lacking in soul and musicality.
The Rach 2 is another interesting one as it also made many 'best of year' lists but I'm struggling to listen past the first movement. Maybe it improves after that but he's lost me already - I find it almost brashly romantic, in a 'Brief Encounter' kind of way; his playing and that of the orchestra for me make it sound very hackneyed and cliched indeed. It loses all of the finesse and subtleties that it can have in the right hands. My favourite two recordings of this are the Ashkenazy and more recently Khatia Buniatishvili - they are much more focused on the inner workings of the music rather than the surface emotion.
|
|
|
Post by jandl100 on Feb 8, 2019 15:29:26 GMT
Yes, I agree - having sat through all of the Rach PC2 my mind wandered all over the place, seldom focussing on the music. I doubt he'd do any better on the Beethoven/Schubert axis - his Bach was metronomic and tedious.
He is very photogenic, maybe that gives him a leg up as far as the recording company is concerned. And perhaps he does better in live concert where Ms Argerich was impressed?
|
|
|
Post by julesd68 on Feb 8, 2019 15:43:32 GMT
Maybe! He must be better than this.
I think DG are doing a very good job 'selling' him. But I am surprised by some of the plaudits these releases are getting.
|
|
|
Post by Pinch on Feb 8, 2019 15:56:59 GMT
Not familiar, but will give his Rachmaninoff Trios a go.
|
|
|
Post by julesd68 on Feb 8, 2019 16:03:14 GMT
Good stuff - let us know what you think - I think his Rach 2 is rather 'Marmite' ...
|
|