tonedeaf
Rank: Trio
Oldies are Goldies
Posts: 168
|
Post by tonedeaf on Mar 27, 2018 18:44:10 GMT
Hi all, I've not been into this mode of hifi, and I'm looking to add a really nice 1970s cassette deck to my keeper collection.
It has to be silver but brand wise I'm open to suggestions
Cheers
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Mar 27, 2018 19:01:01 GMT
I always liked the Aiwa solenoid decks - reliable and worked smoothly. I had one myself.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Mar 27, 2018 19:56:01 GMT
I love the old Tandbergs.
|
|
|
Post by julesd68 on Mar 27, 2018 20:21:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by zippy on Mar 28, 2018 7:58:37 GMT
I always lusted after a Nakamichi, but could never afford one and settled for a SONY instead. It was pretty good as I recall, though not really up to todays standards. I have a feeling that they only made Nakamichis in black though.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Mar 28, 2018 11:41:10 GMT
Has to be a Nakamichi
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2018 12:14:46 GMT
I had a Teac A400 which was quite a good deck in its day. I liked it quite a lot.
|
|
|
Post by dsjr on Mar 28, 2018 13:55:30 GMT
At the time, Nak ruled - period!!! They weren't always reliable and the 700 and 1000 models were terrible for dry joints or noisy connector blocks inside. By now, parts will be wearing out and although the heads have a good life I recall, the motor bushings, belts and pressure rollers may be impossible to get. When running, my 700ZXE was a wonderful thing and although black, the 682ZX has to be my favourite of all as the money went inside where it matters...
Tandbergs were unreliable clanky things, Aiwa's were nice if you can find an unmolested one, Pioneers had good design but no two were set up the same (The CTF 2121 that had rave reviews was one particular sample taken round each reviewer and production ones weren't always the same - see, review deceit was rife even then)
The one thing to watch apart from reliability is the eq methods used. Naks were different to earlier machines which often tinkered with the individual machine eq for best measurements. tapes made on one machine would be different to others. Nak's form of eq was eventually adopted I believe and later, the Dolby S machines used a Nak ZX9? as their master reference and all machines thus equipped followed this eq standard.
I know I'mnot helping, but one thing pertinent to me is that my old Denon machine's eq plays back old tapes nicely, but recordings made on it always sounded muffled when played back on a Nakamichi standard machine.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Mar 28, 2018 19:06:26 GMT
No, actually there were a few models available in silver. I know a few people who had motor problems with Nakamichi decks. My own choices of cassette decks were Denons and Technics models, but none of those were silver. Of course, a R:R would be the thing!
|
|
tonedeaf
Rank: Trio
Oldies are Goldies
Posts: 168
|
Post by tonedeaf on Mar 29, 2018 7:34:51 GMT
No, actually there were a few models available in silver. I know a few people who had motor problems with Nakamichi decks. My own choices of cassette decks were Denons and Technics models, but none of those were silver. Of course, a R:R would be the thing! I know nothing about r2r as never had one in the family when I was growing up. By the time I could afford my own kit they were obsolete or just superceded by new technology
|
|