|
Post by rfan8312 on Jul 29, 2018 5:49:03 GMT
I watched a TED talk in which they mentioned that autopsy studies of women and men killed in car accidents have shown that 40% of the women between ages 40-50 had evidence of microscopic cancers in their breasts and 50%-60% of the men had microscopic cancers in their prostrate. The study showed that by 70 yrs. of age everyone will have microscopic bits of cancer in their thyroid. The talk then shifted to the topic of angiogenesis which means creation of blood vessels and pathways, something which cancerous tumors need to survive. Without a blood supply cancerous tumors cannot grow and they are essentially stifled to remain where they are and not spread. So while everyone can have cancer within them, as long as blood pathways aren't grown towards the tumors the tumors cannot become dangerous. The talk then reaches it's actual point, anti-angiogenic foods. Tomatoes, red grapes, red wine and certain teas( Chinese jasmine, Japanese sencha, Earl gray)are listed as being anti-angiogenic. This is one of my favorite Ted Talks. It's called Starving Cancer. www.ted.com/talks/william_li?utm_campaign=tedspread&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Jul 29, 2018 9:23:04 GMT
TED talks are brilliant, I love em' and watch oodles.
One of the major problems with so called health risks is that historically a large percentage of studies have been sponsored or completely paid for by either drug or food companies. Read into that what you will, but that cannot be right and are the results ever going to be independent?
Going further, many are just ideas or beliefs which have no real founding in science, no long term clinical trials and yet are ingrained in our psyche as being true - dogma can be a very powerful thing.
Our ability to test and fully understand how the human body functions is still a work in progress. It's amazing how we have ignored so many things which are pretty obvious and have been bent toward believing what the food companies tell us are good for us. I mean how can major food corporations be allowed to sponsor University studies?
Like anything, do you own research and don't just take everything you read as gospel, until you delve a little deeper and take account of opposing views
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Jul 29, 2018 10:29:08 GMT
Thanks Martin The big problem about TED talks is you have to keep watching them !
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jul 30, 2018 5:45:23 GMT
TED talks are brilliant, I love em' and watch oodles.
They are rather compelling, aren't they?
|
|
|
Post by Tim on Jul 30, 2018 7:30:05 GMT
What I like about them is the speakers are often experts in their field, who have either first hand experience or proven research to draw on. So they know what they're talking about, as opposed to journalists who often have neither.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2018 12:28:10 GMT
I think a lot of the warnings given out are what they know at the time and could change at any point. I remember growing up and being told I shouldn't eat butter because it was full of fat and that the alternative was to use margarine, then it went full swing and we were being told that margarine was synthetic and could potentially cause cancer, so you should use butter after all.
As stated above, a balanced diet with sufficient exercise is probably the key.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Aug 1, 2018 8:59:10 GMT
|
|