|
Post by dcolver on Jan 24, 2015 18:51:58 GMT
I thought a Naim Muso might serve as an upmarket kitchen radio, and went to hear one in a store using music I knew well. It fell a long way short of the expectations built up by press coverage. Anyone else tried one of these things?
|
|
|
Post by John on Jan 24, 2015 18:56:15 GMT
It certainly been built up! But I really do not see the point of it, as for the press building things up it is always good to listen first
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Naim Muso
Jan 24, 2015 19:46:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 19:46:29 GMT
The over hype on this product is considerable
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Jan 24, 2015 21:25:43 GMT
Hype sells kit
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 25, 2015 1:00:22 GMT
I've never really heard of it! The hype never reached me, but I stopped reading the hifi press. Anyway, after a quick Gurgle, I think I have caught up. This segment of the WTF review caught my attention. OK, so it's not hifi. Thanks, that's all we needed to know.
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Jan 25, 2015 1:35:31 GMT
I'm always suspicious when different (so-called) reviews of a product all start with virtually the same wording, for instance... Huffington Post - Naim is probably not a name that you'll immediately recognise, not unless a) you're very rich or b) you have a serious love of all things hi-fi. Digital Spy - Naim might not be a company you have heard before. Chances are, if you aren't into high-end audio, they are a bit of a misnomer. Wired - Unless you’re an audiophile, you’ve probably never heard of Naim. Digital Spy's use of the word "misnomer" doesn't even make sense, to me at least. It sounds very much like, "I've never heard one, but Naim have sent me some bumph and I've now got to re-write it in my own words." I may be totally wrong of course, but...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2015 7:41:55 GMT
Hype sells kit Hi Mike i would not not disagree unless you auditioned before you purchased then the hype is very apparent The muso is aimed primarily at non naimies as a way of introducing the brand to a wider audience, however the muso has not lived up to sales expectations despite being available in high profile outlets like John Lewis and Richer Sounds
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Jan 25, 2015 8:21:33 GMT
The Bose and other items come to mind
The ad says it's good Close enough for most
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 25, 2015 9:15:01 GMT
I thought the option of buying a different coloured front cover (a 120 x 628mm speaker grille) for a mere 70 quid is a bit of a scream! I was also amused to read that the casing is mdf with a bit of aluminium stretched over it which is described variously as: "....premium quality materials." "....an extremely heavy block if exquisitely cut metal " "....extruded aluminium, anodised aluminium and wood" "....a beautiful block of Sonos-baiting aluminium "....MDF...improves the cabinet's damping."
I am sure it will do very well!
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 25, 2015 9:32:29 GMT
"Avoid turning up the volume too high, as the sound starts to thicken"
LOL!
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 25, 2015 9:42:02 GMT
Yes, and that comment is from a so called hifi magazine that otherwise raves about the thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2015 13:17:38 GMT
To be fair Mike Bose & B & O are firmly aimed at at the more style conscience aesthetic orientated buyer who primary concern is to match one's contemporary interior and they are masters of high class spin which works well for their particular business model cannot deny this fact.
Also to be fair this is a greater proportion of the populous than the audiophile buying public who represent a very minority of the audio equipment buying public hence why you can find them in John Lewis et al
The way the buying public purchase audio (in any form) is changing so far the bulk of the muso has been sold to dire hard naimies who wish to keep the faith alive and purchase one for second system (boom box duties) put the conservatory or bedroom.
The concept idea was good, but a couple of years too late and out gunned by other more keenly priced products remember over 90% of the audio device buying public are not precious about various brands like in the late 80's and 90's they will buy what suits their lifestyle not on how good it's sounds or whether the GF will flail their back with a 24vdc cat 'o nine tails as the new purchase doesn't match the Laura Ashley interior make over.
What next?
Possibly a lady's pleasure tool that plays flight of Valkyries at the critical moment before orgasmic release then performs a self cleaning operation to 'wash that man right out of my life'
These days for the mainstream companies marketing is the key tool for sales ironically not the products, just ask a McDonalds franchise owner
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 25, 2015 16:10:37 GMT
Explains why Beats headphones are so popular. It sure isn't for the sound quality.
|
|
|
Post by canetoad on Jan 26, 2015 1:24:35 GMT
The lowest common denominator will always buy what they're told to. It's why complete incompetents get elected to government! As Bill Hicks used to say... "are you in marketing? Kill yourself!" Do the world a favour...
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 26, 2015 7:14:34 GMT
It fell a long way short of the expectations built up by press coverage. It sounds a lot of us are critical of it in some way or another but (from what has been said) I don't think any of us except you have heard it. What exactly was wrong with it to make it so poor?
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 26, 2015 22:35:38 GMT
I think, as with Bose, you can look at it and then you can consider the price. Whichever way you assess it, it appears to be packaged up mutton.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 23:37:07 GMT
I never thought I'd see a naim product available at Richer Sounds. Mind you I never thought they would make something like the Mu-so. I've not heard one but I intend to out of curiosity.
|
|
|
Post by dcolver on Jan 26, 2015 23:39:52 GMT
It had a one-note bass. I played some Bach through it and couldn't sing the cello line. Rather like a Bose, really.
At the price and size I would not blame it for that, had the advertising not set a different expectation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2015 23:54:07 GMT
It was less expensive (£895) than I'd expected. That's the Richer Sounds price, which I'm assuming is the standard RRP.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 27, 2015 0:51:49 GMT
It had a one-note bass. I played some Bach through it and couldn't sing the cello line. Right, thanks for letting me know that.
|
|