|
Post by Mr Whippy on Mar 1, 2018 23:10:38 GMT
Are these deaf?
I've listened to a few of their vids, and they all sound... shite.
Wondered if they had had much response.
Here's one example:
Compare it to this:
Which would you rather listen to?
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Mar 1, 2018 23:17:32 GMT
The first video isn't working for me, but I'm betting I'd prefer the second one.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Mar 1, 2018 23:33:21 GMT
Don't quite understand. It's working with Tapatalk, but not with Chrome or Opera browsers.
The video is:APL-FW9Xw-I
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Mar 1, 2018 23:42:08 GMT
To be fair, it does sound better from YouTube direct. I use a YouTube downloader app for YouTube and it sounds significantly poorer than the promo, for some reason. On the other hand, the promo sounds about the same from YouTube or the app.
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Mar 2, 2018 12:53:28 GMT
This is the misfiring video.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Mar 2, 2018 17:35:13 GMT
Thanks. I tried using Chrome mobile last night, but it still didn't work. Must be some restriction somewhere.
Downloaded both vids and the promo still sounded preferable to me. Cracking song and production.
Might as well delete the thread I think.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Mar 2, 2018 17:42:17 GMT
I do prefer the original. The "improved" version just sounds like they've thrown all of their toys at the song regardless of whether they prove to be beneficial or not. What they have succeeded in doing, however, to my ears at least, is leeching most of the soul and atmosphere from of the recording. It sounds too clinical now if anything.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Mar 2, 2018 19:03:45 GMT
Aye. Pretty much what I thought. I tried about 8 uploads and stopped when I found the promo shown, as it had the depth and atmosphere that was missing with the others.
|
|