|
Post by MartinT on Aug 8, 2023 10:42:17 GMT
Politicians don't believe in transparency.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Feb 25, 2024 16:47:29 GMT
What AI tool can you recommend to summarise YouTube videos ? To save time, maybe lots of time
I'm tired of going through videos that are not what they say they are Videos of 30 minutes, 60 minutes can usually be easily summarised
I haven't been using ChatGPT or any other AI tool and I reckon I'm missing a trick or three
Perhaps an AI can be trained to summarise "This is not what the title says" "This takes over an hours to say one thing, which is......" even "This is rubbish"
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Feb 25, 2024 17:05:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 10, 2024 9:23:30 GMT
New Scientist article
AI has its data checked by people who often don't know the field they are working in
The answers which could be right, wrong or somewhere in between are then in the answers given by AI forevermore
So AI even more faulted than I thought
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Apr 10, 2024 13:16:35 GMT
AI is fuelled by enormous amounts of raw data. The internet is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely,mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think a New Scientist article is big, but that's just peanuts to The Internet. (With apologies to Douglas Adams) The point is, an AI model begins with scraping up an unimaginably huge amount of raw data. Now, what else do we all know about the Internet apart from how immense it is? That everything ever committed to it, from E=mc 2 to Auntie Lakshmi's recipe for Murgir Jhol, is the absolute, complete and utter truth...
|
|
|
Post by John on Apr 10, 2024 13:51:35 GMT
42
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Apr 10, 2024 14:29:29 GMT
Think of it as we do now with Wikipedia.
Highly useful, but fact-check everything.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 10, 2024 14:42:18 GMT
Quote from a review of the book Code Dependant by Madhumita Murgia
"data annotator ... labelling bones for medical AI without knowing human anatomy"
"other labellers sometimes have to guess at the least wrong answer"
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Apr 10, 2024 14:43:37 GMT
Think of it as we do now with Wikipedia. Highly useful, but fact-check everything. Ok if you have plenty of time and give a damn When you are surrounded by fire and bogey men the fastest answer could well be the one to go for
|
|
|
Post by Slinger on Apr 10, 2024 15:03:04 GMT
Think of it as we do now with Wikipedia. Highly useful, but fact-check everything. But what does one fact-check with, and why not go there first?
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Apr 10, 2024 15:07:57 GMT
Because AI, like Wikipedia, can give you a base from which to start
|
|