|
Post by MartinT on Feb 25, 2021 12:51:41 GMT
ReplayGain can be used to normalise the volume between different tracks in order to maintain the same level when listening to music. What's more interesting to me is that ReplayGain is also a good indicator of music that suffers from loudness wars and compression. If I tap on album artwork in BubbleUPnP I can view the metadata, and included is the ReplayGain figure. The closer to zero, the less it needs turning down and the more likely that it hasn't been compressed (not an exact science, I know). Conversely, a high figure shows it to be very much louder than the average track, and in consequence needs turning down in order not to be deafened. I have disabled ReplayGain in my playback as I prefer to listen to unadulterated data, but I am finding it a very useful measure of quality. Just now, I listened to Clean Coloured Wire by Engineers and immediately had to turn it down from my usual position. Looking at ReplayGain, it shows a whopping 10.7dB above average. That's a huge variation from normal, and it sounds it. The number is calculated per track, and varies across an album but 10.7 is the worst I've seen so far. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReplayGain
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Feb 25, 2021 12:54:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Feb 25, 2021 14:21:45 GMT
That's interesting I often go from one CD to another with a small or occasionally huge difference in volume
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Feb 25, 2021 16:36:56 GMT
This one almost took my head off. -11.47dB and it sounds LOUD. Great interpretation of Ian Curtis' superb creation, though.
|
|
|
Post by speedysteve on Feb 25, 2021 17:02:12 GMT
In general, whilst some newer albums are a bit louder than others, and especially Vs the 'good old days' quiet recordings, I'm finding less and less newer ones are loudnessed to death like they were some 15 odd years ago.
Either they have found a way to do it without screwing up the sound (unlikely), or they've learned something and have turned down the heat a bit. There is awareness in the mixing and production side of things.
I haven't become less sensitive to it - when you come across it, it's like a slap on the ears.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Feb 25, 2021 18:48:38 GMT
I'd agree with that. There are many good new releases as well as the usual compressed crap.
|
|
|
Post by stanleyb on Mar 2, 2021 19:13:51 GMT
Different audio playback software give a different figure for ReplayGain in their onscreen database display. MediaMonkey shows it as a negative number the more the signal is compressed and then amplified, which is exactly what happened in the loudness war.
Talking about loudness war, I spent some time looking for different releases of the same original recording over the years. And by using an audio editor called Adobe Audition I then look at the audio waveform to find the one with the least clipped signal peaks.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Mar 2, 2021 19:24:59 GMT
Nice to see you around, Stan. My playback software (shown further up) gives ReplayGain as a negative number, the more negative it is the more compressed the music. I've come across a couple of albums where it's close to 0, a good outcome.
|
|
|
Post by stanleyb on Mar 2, 2021 21:17:01 GMT
For 96 and 192 files the number tends to be positive.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Mar 2, 2021 21:20:59 GMT
For 96 and 192 files the number tends to be positive. I haven't seen any yet. I'll keep a lookout.
|
|