|
Post by Slinger on Nov 27, 2019 16:32:25 GMT
Lasers could cut lifespan of nuclear waste from "a million years to 30 minutes," says Nobel laureate...Gérard Mourou has already won a Nobel for his work with fast laser pulses. If he gets pulses 10,000 times faster, he says he can modify waste on an atomic level. If no solution is found, we're already stuck with some 22,000 cubic meters of long-lasting hazardous waste. Whatever one thinks of nuclear energy, the process results in tons of radioactive, toxic waste no one quite knows what to do with. As a result, it's tucked away as safely as possible in underground storage areas where it's meant to remain a long, long time: The worst of it, uranium 235 and plutonium 239, have a half life of 24,000 years. That's the reason eyebrows were raised in Europe — where more countries depend on nuclear energy than anywhere else — when physicist Gérard Mourou mentioned in his wide-ranging Nobel acceptance speech that lasers could cut the lifespan of nuclear waste from " a million years to 30 minutes," as he put it in a followup interview with The Conversation. STORY
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Nov 27, 2019 17:34:55 GMT
Be wonderful if anywhere near true
|
|
|
Post by John on Nov 27, 2019 17:44:59 GMT
I really hope something like this can happen as nuclear energy would really cut down our carbon footprint
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Nov 28, 2019 6:46:53 GMT
It's a real dilemma, this one. I have always supported nuclear power done safely as it's better than the alternatives of coal, oil and gas. Hydro/wind/tide is even better still but we just don't have enough of that. I have been frustrated by the UK government's reluctance to invest properly in future nuclear energy. Then, when they do, they award a contract to a foreign company as if we don't have the technology ourselves! Looking at the graphs below, we clearly rely too much on North Sea gas which is doing nothing for our environment and which will one day run out. Remember that the percentage of electric cars will continue growing. There doesn't seem to be a power generation response to the future demand. If the laser waste disposal technology works on a big scale, it could be our saving. No more Chernobyls, though.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 10, 2019 22:03:58 GMT
Och,that's rubbish Just do what the did with it up here... The Pit as it was called was exactly that. A 60 metre deep shaft that got filled with oil drums filled with nuclear waste then cemented. Worked great till it exploded. Brilliant. Must have had our best scientific minds working on that one. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-48036793
|
|
|
Post by Eduardo Wobblechops on Dec 10, 2019 22:16:26 GMT
A lot more money needs to be spent on fusion research.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Dec 11, 2019 6:37:27 GMT
A lot more money needs to be spent on fusion research. ...until they accidentally make a black hole which gobbles up the Earth!
|
|
|
Post by Eduardo Wobblechops on Dec 11, 2019 12:36:46 GMT
LOL, that would solve the energy crisis.
|
|