Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2017 16:06:32 GMT
There is a legal requirement for product to be fit for purpose which means that there are rights well beyond a one year guarantee period. This means that a refund could be obtained in the MF situation at least up to 2 years if you are willing to pursue the matter. Pretty sure they would cough up with legal threats or if taken to small claims court you would win. Claim would be based on expected durability which on a luxury product might be 7 years.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisB on Jan 13, 2017 18:04:17 GMT
I'm wholly in agreement with the OP - there are no guns being held to anyone heads here. Because someone else doesn't ascribe the same value for money judgement as the buyer, it's no reason to claim they have been 'ripped off'. To me, the term ripped off implies actual criminal activity.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Jan 14, 2017 0:36:30 GMT
Can't say I've felt that way - I only ever buy tat.
But then, if I had bought, say a Naim Armageddon, and someone told me the actual cost involved to make it, I might well feel that way.
What about Descrimintary/Dynamic Pricing, which is set to become the norm in the next 5 years? Basically, companies supplying services to you will do so charging you purely by how much they think you will be prepared to pay, based on personal data they have on you.
Have a listen on the BBC iPlayer for Radio4/Dec 31/ Money Box/The Death Of The Single Price/12.04
|
|
|
Post by Greg on Jan 14, 2017 2:35:25 GMT
What about Descrimintary/Dynamic Pricing, which is set to become the norm in the next 5 years? Basically, companies supplying services to you will do so charging you purely by how much they think you will be prepared to pay, based on personal data they have on you. Have a listen on the BBC iPlayer for Radio4/Dec 31/ Money Box/The Death Of The Single Price/12.04 Yes, I heard that edition of Money Box. Descriminatory pricing is a bit of a worry, already being used widely in Finland and to a degree here by the likes of Amazon. To get an full understanding, as Whippy suggests, give Money Box a listen.
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Jan 14, 2017 8:35:55 GMT
We have had this sort of pricing for years, possibly since items were first sold or traded. This is taking it too far IMO and there will be rip offs that I can see will target the more vulnerable
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2017 11:07:56 GMT
Can't say I've felt that way - I only ever buy tat. But then, if I had bought, say a Naim Armageddon, and someone told me the actual cost involved to make it, I might well feel that way. What about Descrimintary/Dynamic Pricing, which is set to become the norm in the next 5 years? Basically, companies supplying services to you will do so charging you purely by how much they think you will be prepared to pay, based on personal data they have on you. Have a listen on the BBC iPlayer for Radio4/Dec 31/ Money Box/The Death Of The Single Price/12.04 Perhaps their data will identify I am prepared to pay fuck all and offer me stuff for free.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2017 15:56:38 GMT
You cannot be ripped off unless you are sub-intelligent or there has been deliberate fraud involved. I disagree with you on this one, for example, prior to her death, my Grandma lost a lot of money to charities who hounded her for donations. She was in the early stages of Dementia but still had the majority of her faculties and remained managing her finances at the time. This had nothing to do with intellect or fraudulent practises, it was just she was vulnerable. It wasn't until my Dad took over her finances a couple of years later, once the Dementia had progressed, that we became aware of how much of an issue it became. Additionally, a lot of the time, people with superior intelligence have limited to no common sense, so falling foul of being ripped off is incredibly possible.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 14, 2017 17:00:30 GMT
Paul, with respect, I clearly stated that mental issues are excluded. Of course someone with dementia is excluded from my basic premise.
"Equally, if you are at risk of lacking good judgement due to mental illness or dementia."
|
|
|
Post by The Brookmeister on Jan 14, 2017 17:20:52 GMT
Interesting thread Martin.
|
|
|
Post by The Brookmeister on Jan 14, 2017 17:23:31 GMT
I'm wholly in agreement with the OP - there are no guns being held to anyone heads here. Because someone else doesn't ascribe the same value for money judgement as the buyer, it's no reason to claim they have been 'ripped off'. To me, the term ripped off implies actual criminal activity. Agreed. Also there is the man pride thing, if I had paid £500 for an ipad then go to my mates house and he got the same one cheaper I would feel ripped off surely? No probably not, I would feel stupid cos he got a better deal but say out loud I had been ripped off to hide my stupidity! Not that I would buy an ipad in a million years!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2017 17:55:30 GMT
Paul, with respect, I clearly stated that mental issues are excluded. Of course someone with dementia is excluded from my basic premise. "Equally, if you are at risk of lacking good judgement due to mental illness or dementia." Whoops, I really should learn to read posts properly before replying... my mistake I missed your comment about metal illness and dementia. sorry.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2017 18:00:21 GMT
I'm wholly in agreement with the OP - there are no guns being held to anyone heads here. Because someone else doesn't ascribe the same value for money judgement as the buyer, it's no reason to claim they have been 'ripped off'. To me, the term ripped off implies actual criminal activity. Agreed. Also there is the man pride thing, if I had paid £500 for an ipad then go to my mates house and he got the same one cheaper I would feel ripped off surely? No probably not, I would feel stupid cos he got a better deal but say out loud I had been ripped off to hide my stupidity! Not that I would buy an ipad in a million years! Totally agree with this one Dave, male pride accounts for a lot of behaviours!
|
|
|
Post by Mr Whippy on Jan 14, 2017 18:35:52 GMT
We have had this sort of pricing for years, possibly since items were first sold or traded. This is taking it too far IMO and there will be rip offs that I can see will target the more vulnerable Well, yes. Holidays and plane flights hiked-up at peak times during the year and discounts for bulk buying are just two. The difference is is that the practice will become widespread as more and more personal data becomes available/monitored/collected/sold. Imagine, I'm a direct seller and I've made a Belles Beater amp (oh yes...). The price to you is just £7K (I know you've got it, Mike. I know you've got it.). I know a certain MartinT could well be interested. I like the cut of his jib and know that his mattress is a tad lumpy with the wads of notes he has under it, so I give him a price of £10K. Would that seem OK to you? Would Martin not feel a tad ripped-off gaining the knowledge that you could get it for £3K less?
|
|
|
Post by MikeMusic on Jan 14, 2017 19:51:35 GMT
We have had this sort of pricing for years, possibly since items were first sold or traded. This is taking it too far IMO and there will be rip offs that I can see will target the more vulnerable Well, yes. Holidays and plane flights hiked-up at peak times during the year and discounts for bulk buying are just two. The difference is is that the practice will become widespread as more and more personal data becomes available/monitored/collected/sold. Imagine, I'm a direct seller and I've made a Belles Beater amp (oh yes...). The price to you is just £7K (I know you've got it, Mike. I know you've got it.). I know a certain MartinT could well be interested. I like the cut of his jib and know that his mattress is a tad lumpy with the wads of notes he has under it, so I give him a price of £10K. Would that seem OK to you? Would Martin not feel a tad ripped-off gaining the knowledge that you could get it for £3K less? Gazumping for all !
|
|
|
Post by davidf on Jan 14, 2017 23:16:45 GMT
Do Lamborghini Gallardo owners shout rip off when they find out they've effectively bought an Audio R8? No, firstly, because they've bought a Lamborghini. Secondly, because they probably knew that before buying the Lamborghini anyway. If you had a choice, which would you have?
Although, I'm fully aware that the Audio R8 followed the Gallardo. On that note, do any R8 owners label the Audio R8 a rip off because it is a Gallardo? Probably not, but Gallardo owners may label the R8 a blatant rip off - why? Because it is cheaper and relatively close in performance, so it threatens the value of their purchase.
Of those who bought that Theta transport, did anyone complain of its performance? Was it badly reviewed? Probably not, because everyone was happy with its performance. Only when people are fed a version of the truth do they then shout rip off and aren't happy. Manufacturers basing their models on another's usually implement their own software, or have to mate their software with that of the product they're basing theirs upon. Plus adding in their own bespoke facia and buttons etc, providing their own warranty and support, and the end user pays for storage. By that, I mean that if a manufacturer stockpiles a product, it is taken into account with the rrp, so when you order one, it is with your dealer next day. The alternative is building to order, which keeps costs down, but delays ownership.
In my view, there aren't many reliable Bluray players out there, and why a high end manufacturer would go to the massive expense of designing their own is beyond me, as there's just so much to go wrong. If I had say, a Mark Levinson system, I'd happily pay a premium for a Mark Levinson badged player (with matching facia/remote system etc) that was just an Oppo BDP103 under the bonnet. I wouldn't consider it a rip off, as they've used a quality player in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Jan 15, 2017 9:27:28 GMT
Whilst I agree in principle there are a hell of a lot of dubious "offers" and pricing strategys that you do have to be wary of and do take a reasonable amount of grey matter to not fall victim to. I present the major supermarkets as a prize example.
There's a few "free" postage type scams out there as well that are a simple rip off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2017 15:59:48 GMT
I think Dave hit the nail on the head when he mentioned Male Pride to be fair, I think that has a lot to do with how us men behave and react to situations.
Certainly, I am somewhat perturbed by the way in which the Hifi industry is focussed in on a few brands, and I have fallen fowl of this myself certainly around the Naim/Linn world but I am slowly moving towards better value alternatives.
For instance, I had an ageing Linn Sondek that I sold and some time later bought my current Rega to replace it, and I have to say that I get a lot more enjoyment out of the Rega which was a darn site cheaper than the Linn!
In terms of the vulnerable, I have real issue with the way some unscrupulous organisations appear to target them, and it appears charities are the worst of the lot... which is why I get a little hot under the collar about such subjects and misinterpreted what Martin had written on his first post.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 15, 2017 18:34:00 GMT
Would that seem OK to you? Would Martin not feel a tad ripped-off gaining the knowledge that you could get it for £3K less? Thinking this one through honestly. I might feel aggrieved that I hadn't secured the better price. However, I would still be making a value judgement and either wouldn't buy it or would consider the 'Belles-beater' to be good enough to buy at the price asked. Any way it goes, I wouldn't be proclaiming that I'd been ripped off.
|
|
|
Post by MartinT on Jan 15, 2017 18:44:16 GMT
certainly around the Naim/Linn world but I am slowly moving towards better value alternatives. For me personally, neither the Naim with its same tired circuit topology or the Linn with its near-Ariston/AR/Dunlop suspension interests me one bit. Some research reveals that there is simply insufficient technology there to attract me. Would I look at alternatives that are better built and breathed on by, say, Nelson Pass, Wayne Colburn or Charlie Hansen? You bet!
|
|